The title bespeaks of reactionary caustic bitterness and antagonism against those who purport that they do not believe in "God" [even though they - illogically AND hypocritically - print or mouth that particular Divine name as if such did exist, but which supposedly (according to their foolish and dishonest immentality of absurd denial) does not exist....so why would they even mention that Name referencing who allegedly does not even exist if there supposedly is no such Entity to admit or doubt the existence of?
Would you like to make this site your homepage? It's fast and easy...
Yes, Please make this my home page!
I am getting religious, I know. So what the hell are homo-atheists going to do about it? Them, and whose army?
Must Christians such as I apologize, and then me continue on to apologize for inclusion of the word "religion" in the two vaguely-ambiguous "religion"-word clauses of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (which I personally never initially concocted nor originally penned myself)?
Why would they blame ME for something which I did NOT write, nor for "forcing" them to read and/or remember that which their founding fathers wrote and arguably put them and me, as United States citizens, under legal and law-enforced subjection to?
It behooves them to keep in mind, in their pompous-ass arrogance, that as homo-atheists or agnostics - by continuing to impose their despicable carcass on United States territory, and thus criminally trespassing upon, by they themselves continuing to reside on territory which they did not create, therefore do not own, never have owned, nor have any right to remain upon, are automatically being "forced" to read traffic signs and civil statutes plus "forced" to implement them by those who adhere to such Constitutional "religion" clauses as civil law, irrespective of their insolent and defiant demands to "keep your laws off my body." No, instead the retort to them is: "Get your damned rotten body the hell off property you do not deserve to be on nor have any right to pollute, infest, and continue to defile!"
OK, so I am supposed to be nice to fools who profess to not believe in God, or profess that they do not know if there is a God to believe in. But how about they THEMSELVES and conversely being nice to Christians who DO profess to believe in God? How about MUTUALLY being relentlessly patient with, tolerant of, and not slanderous nor critical nor defaming nor insulting nor condemnatory opposite and opposing viewpoints?
Along those lines, if atheists and agnostics presume that they have some right to advertise or proclaim their minority-status disbelief about God, do not genuine Christians have a right to advertise or proclaim their belief in God?
If quasi-insane mentally-challenged atheists and agnostics disdain the impeccable logic and Biblical allegiance of Scripture-verses-professing Christians, do not authentic Christians have even more right to not have the sordid philosophical crap of atheist or agnostic disbelief shoved into their faces and down their throats?
Should atheists and agnostics object to having parts of the Christian's Bible read to them? IF so, on what grounds should they balk against that? WHY do they NOT want parts of the Bible read to them?
WHY? Is such a terrible threat to closed-minded and selfish atheistic irrationality and the PSEUDO-"admirable" or PSEUDO-"educated" noxiously-self-centered doubts of asinine agnostics?
Should Christians object to having the anti-God's-existence disbelief of atheists and agnostics imposed on them? On what grounds should such harassment be committed and not "performed?" WHY do Christians NOT want refractory and non-accommodating disbelief of atheists and agnostics imposed on them?
Are disbelievers scared that atheistic denial and agnostic doubt will covert them? Are disbeliever absolutely certain that they are not wasting their money and time in futile and fruitless persuasion efforts to propagandize their disbelief against the Bible so as to irreparably and permanently destroy the belief of Christians in doctrinal statements contained within the Bible? Or discredit and destroy Bible Text itself? Or discredit and destroy the Creator God who inspired certain humans of His choice to author the contents of the Bible? Or discredit and destroy the environmental entities around them which Creator God created around them and placed them inescapably within?
Should I repeat what I stated before, earlier in this piece?
WHY do atheists and agnostics get the "bizarre, strange, and weird" concept of even somewhat suspecting credibility of the possibility of an already-previously-existing, perfectly-consistent, generally-benevolent, non-forcing Creator God....illogically mixed up seamlessly in non-justified integrated oneness of and with imperfectly-inconsistent, often non-reliable, faulty and disappointing, belligerently-forceful-and-extortionist human beings created by the Creator God?
WHY do they mis-equate the perfect Creator with imperfect humans?
WHERE is the justification for THAT? WHERE is the logical and rational FAIRNESS of that?
Simply because some human creatures claim to be God themselves, or at least purportedly speak for Him?
For everyone's information, SOME human creatures have INDEED not only purported to speak God's will and intentions to humans in general, but actually HAVE spoken and written such, and have imprinted their magnificent and phenomenally-intelligent writings in a summary book called: THE Holy Bible -- which again, atheists and agnostics do not want read nor communicated to them.
WHY do atheists and agnostic NOT want such Bible verses read to them?
Simply because "they can?"
WHY would they WANT to do what they can?
Merely because they want to do what they can? And that is it?
They certainly can want to do what they can, and Christians can also want to do what they can.
Equal treatment, and equal opportunity, no?
If they, as atheists or agnostics, do not like it, THEY must and not should LEAVE! They MUST get the hell out of my Christian presence....NOW! WHY would
they continue to bother themselves by staying around me? WHY punish themselves? WHY abuse themselves by themselves? They should do themselves a favor, and buzz off.
I MYSELF am NOT going to leave.
As just stated, THEY THEMSELVES must leave, get the hell out of MY way, and get their STINKING ASSES OFF MY property!
I have come to experience that, more often than not, atheists and agnostics ultimately refuse to talk to Bible-espousing-and-quoting Christians, when and because Bible-espousing-and-quoting Christian quote, or try to quote, Bible-verses passages of Scripture to them.
WHY is THAT?
Sure, the contents of Holy Scripture are diametrically opposed, over and over, all throughout the entirety of The Holy Bible, against disbelievers and doubters called "atheists" and "agnostics." But WHY do atheists and agnostics react so adamantly, lividly, hatefully, and violently against having whatever parts of The Bible read to them? WHAT is so uncomfortable, disagreeable, distressing, and/or diabolically devastating about Bible verses read or quoted to them, in their laughably-frightened dismay and desperation?
Why not retain the childhood axiom: "Sticks and stones can break my bones, but words will never hurt me?"
According to THEM? Apparently, Bible verses are intolerably destructive to them and their anti-Creator-God prejudice, superstition, and substitute "naturalistic" dogma.
Concerning that, the words of Scripture do NOT adequately relate to natural-environment-entities realty?
WHICH verses do not relate to if not always usual and common, but also and infrequently sometimes possible-to-happen unusual manifestations of natural reality?
Perhaps the one in Ecclesiastes stating: "If a tree falls to the south or to the north, in the place where the tree falls, there it will lie?"
WHY would needless and non-solicited, facetious exceptions of imposing a bulldozer in the context have to be imposed in the futile attempt to discredit that verse? Who is the self-appointed pseudo-authority suddenly mounting his or her high horse and imposing the out-of-context idea that some animal, or bulldozer, or earthquake, whatever HAS to be IMPOSED to supposedly render that verse wrong, misleading, errant, and incorrect?
So THAT Bible verse is NOT supposed to be part of common-sense reality? Give me a break. I politely implore them to not be a ridiculous and smelly donkey's rectum.
And I could go on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on to cite MAN MANY MANY MANY MANY other examples after examples after examples after examples after examples after examples after examples after examples after examples after examples after examples pertaining to OTHER Scripture verses which DO - in FACT - perfectly and sensibly relate to ACTUAL physical-environment REALITY.
And WHO (please, let's not degrade the Entity to a "which" or a "that" object, OK?)...WHO created all natural phenomena that actually exists in actual reality around us?
Inanimate (and even animate) things or objects never have, do not now, and never will, which do not previously exist, create themselves out of nothing. To them I retort: "C'mon, get a life. Get with it. Wake up and smell the coffee."
Have THEY created everything around you and me? Are they KIDDING? Are they CRAZY? Sure as hell THEY have not created it all! NOT them! Their parent or parents, then? Nope. THEIR parents, then? NO? WHO the HELL did it, then? To them I shout: THINK! THINK !!! ANSWER me NOW! Nooooooooooooo delay. Do it, right NOW !!!
By simple deductive logic you and I both, of rational sensibility, have NO common-sense recourse but to default to assume and not presume that some Fabulous and Awesome Being has had to have created all the intelligently-designed phenomena around us. [Of course, such highly-imaginative, intricately-interdependent, extremely-complex natural phenomena, both macro and micro, are deemed to be of "intelligent" classification and category.....instead of stupid or moronic or idiotic or haphazard or random or non-predictable or apprehensively-altering design.....ONLY to those who themselves are intelligent and not stupid nor moronic nor idiotic nor capriciously non-predictable or disgustingly changeable].
What really does exist in NOT helter-skelter in horrifying random chaos, which rational thought itself is a very logical concept exactly concordant with what all is VERY real:
Isaiah 45:18 For thus says the LORD, who created the heavens (HE is God!), who formed Earth and made it (HE established it; HE did not create it a chaos, HE formed it to be inhabited!): "I am the LORD, and there is no other."
So, we come to a temporary conclusion.
Who DARES to take it upon himself or herself to impose or force Christians to include both atheists and agnostics as [supposedly] reasonable, rational, open-minded, thinking beings who inclusively should be tolerated instead of despised and even abhorred?
Does the allegedly-"mandatory" demand to "COEXIST" (the lettering of bumper stickers, forced upon the public-safety-endangered eyesight of all drivers, consisting of iconic symbols of various religions) override and overrule the Christian exclusivity of what the Holy Bible states should be the disassociative attitude of Christians towards disbelievers considered cultic "atheists" and "agnostics?" Can water and oil mix? They NEVER can - be they Ishmael/Esau/Mohammed-Allah Islam versus Isaac/Jacob/Jesus/Yahweh Christianity, Jesus-rejecting judaism versus Jesus-as-One-and-Only-Lord Christianity, buddha-belly idolatry versus no-fat-statue-idols Christianity, etc.
Psalm 10:4 In the pride of his countenance the wicked does not seek Him; all his thoughts are: "There is no God."
Psalm 14:1 To the choirmaster. Of David. The fool says in his heart: "There is no God." THEY are corrupt, THEY do abominable deeds, there is NONE who does good.
Psalm 53:1 To the choirmaster: according to Mahalath. A Maskil of David. The fool says in his heart: "There is no God." THEY are corrupt, doing abominable iniquity; there are NONE who do good.
Misleading and fraudulent are the deceptive dishonest reports of despicable who CLAIM that atheists and agnostics "are some of the nicest people they know" and "are good people" who are charitable philanthropists always or usually "doing good deeds?"
Note the underlining within two of the three Psalm verses quoted above to rightfully CONTRADICT that erroneous evaluation of so-called "good" atheists and agnostics.
The politically-and-otherwise TRULY-"correct" definition of "good" is found in the Bible.....NOT the revisionist-weaselword twisted distortions of what supposedly is "good" in the errant misassertions of godless and godforsaken atheists and agnostics.
One final time:
WHO is "God?" If "God" exists, as Christian believes and mysteriously even "know" for certain, such CANNOT be an unfounded superstition, but there MUST be logical and sensible deductive reasoning and logic which their assertion is based upon.
THINK of all the copies of Bibles of various translations in myriad languages throughout the world, previously and presently. The masses of people who died believing and giving their entire lives for such. How all thereof is universally respected and admired. The innumerable churches and media globally constantly reiterating Bible passages and doctrines. The vast historical records of Bibles and Bible-verse influence sociologically for decades, centuries, millennia. The huge assortment of denominationally-diverse Christians repeating the same Bible verses all over planet Earth - in the past and present. The innovative scientific discoveries and inventions of such.
In my encounters with atheists and agnostics, one certain characteristic is endemic with and in and of all of them:
They fallaciously get the lifeform-like Entity/Being "God" mistakenly and errantly interchanged, replaced, and confused with those who have claimed or currently claim to speak for the SEPARATE-BY-HIMSELF-ALONE obviously-by-logical-deduction omnipotent and omniscient God.....STARKLY contrasted with [His - and why not designate the alleged Supreme Being or Group of Such consisting of male and not female gender categorization?] occasionally lying, sometimes cowardly and dishonest, infrequently misrepresentational, at times aberrational, sort of sometimes non-reliable human creatures -- even those Bible-book authors who have indeed been Divinely inspired to convey God's will and intentions to all human creatures, yet even who themselves have not (for various under-evil-duress causes) COMPLETELY complied with the TOTALITY of Creator God's naturally-evident and Biblically-revealed Scriptural intentions for ALL HIS human creatures encased within HIS bodies which HE HIMSELF has put them within.
By the way, IF they, potential webpage readers, have a problem with that male instead of female gender designation apportioned to the Creator God by this webpage author, strongly consider whether a man....or instead, a woman.....generally - can and does run faster, run farther, reach and jump higher and thus see further, lift heavier weights, creatively invent more, is less moody, hits harder and more persistently, shouts louder, has vocal-pitch and volume capacity of greater range and intensity, can urinate faster with less complications in a more convenient way, is not besieged with debilitating messy menstrual emissions, and is [honestly!] less gullibly susceptible to temptational diversions and deviances.
In other words, exactly WHICH gender is - in fact and quite frankly - the SUPERIOR gender?
First Peter 3:7 Likewise you husbands, live considerately with your wives, bestowing honor on the woman as the weaker vessel [i.e. gender], being that you are joint heirs of the grace of life, in order that your prayers be not hindered.
So, "God" has been classified with a male gender by yours truly. It is easier now to refer to Him (and not "Her") with the at-times-helpful-and-expedient pronoun in place of the title: "God."
Again, the typical atheist or even agnostic exhibits more-than-sad, pathetic and pitiful, remarkably-illogical misconstruence of the admittedly perfect and consistent Creator God....being one-and-the-same identical with His obviously imperfect and inconsistent frequently-faulty, sometimes-severely-disappointing, thankfully-mortal-and-terminational created human creatures.
My advice to atheists and agnostics is this:
Do NOT do that! Keep the perfect and benevolent Creator God SEPARATE from His imperfect and not-always-benevolent faulty and disappointing human creatures, whether professing association with Him or professing disassociation away from Him! Do NOT equate them! ALWAYS distinguish between the infallible God from fallible humans! Never EVER consider them the same.
Inconsistent humans will grieve you; the completely-dependable Creator God will NEVER grieve you with any inconsistency, being that He never has been, is not now, and never will be, inconsistent.
Try to prove me wrong about that -- and you cannot, whether you won't or will. Try as you might; it will never happen.
Worship the perfect Creator GOD ALONE, and NOT imperfect humans!
Matthew 10:37 He/She who loves father or mother [as much as he/she loves] me is not worthy of me; and he/she who loves son or daughter [as much as he/she loves] me is not worthy of me.
Luke 11:27 As [Jesus] said this, a [cultic-catholic] woman in the crowd raised her voice and said to Him: "Blessed is the womb that bore you, and the breasts that you sucked!" ["Holy Mary, muther of Gawd, we pray to you to pray for us sinners..." and so on ad nauseum]
Luke 11:28 But He said: "Blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and keep it!"
Acts 10:25 When Peter entered, Cornelius met him and fell down at his feet and worshiped him.
Acts 10:26 But Peter lifted him up, saying: "Stand up; I too am a man."
Revelation 19:10 Then I fell down at his feet to worship him, but he said to me: "You must not do that! [And what part of that, John, do you not understand?] I am a fellow servant with you and your brethren who hold the testimony of Jesus. Worship God." For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.
Revelation 22:8 I John am he who heard and saw these things. And when I heard and saw them, I fell down to worship at the feet of the angel who showed them to me [obviously dull-of-mind John did not learn very fast; he already had been previously rebuked and ordered to not worship angels, but obviously such command had not registered in his stuck-in-a-rut lingering-bias thick skull yet]
Revelation 22:9 but he said to me: "You MUST NOT do that! [Do NOT do that again! How many times do I have to tell you that? QUIT doing it! Do NOT EVER do THAT AGAIN!] I am a fellow servant with you and your brethren the prophets, and with those who keep the words of this book. Worship God [you lame-brain]."
If you DO worship faulty humans, you deserve all the consternation, disappointment, frustration, pain, misery, and hell you are invariably going to get:
Romans 1:16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel: it is the power of God for salvation to every one who has faith, to the Jew first and also to the Greek [plus Kraut, Commie, Whop, Dego, Spic, Honky, Nigger, Kike, Chink, Mel Brooks in Blazing Saddles, others].
17 For in it the righteousness of God is revealed through faith for faith; as it is written: "He/She who through faith is righteous shall live." [unless you faithlessly crave becoming self-paralyzed in catatonic panic and stupor, presuming that a supposedly-inconsistent God is suddenly and non-predictably going to allow the floor under you to not retain its nucleonic stability and collapse under the then-massively-injured you, or allow the ceiling to non-expectantly crash down on you, or sadistically cause all the oxygen around you to suddenly become suffocating ammonia gas, or capriciously allow gravity to suddenly stop working, resulting in you flying up and outward into outer space and certain airless and excruciatingly-painful death, or God's Sun will suddenly blow up and incinerate you, or on and on and on]
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all godlessness and wickedness of men [and women] who by their wickedness suppress the truth.
19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them.
20 Ever since the creation of the world His invisible nature, namely, His eternal power and deity, has been clearly perceived in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse;
21 for although they knew God they did not honor Him as God or give thanks to Him, but they became futile in their thinking and their senseless minds were darkened.
22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools,
23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal humans or birds or animals or reptiles.
24 Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to [porno-immodest] impurity, to the [obscene-mopheaded/naked-armed/nude-legged/soxless-footed-exhibitionist] dishonoring of their bodies among themselves [especially during seasonal warmth and for sports activities]
25 because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever! Amen.
26 For this cause God gave them up to dishonorable passions. Their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural,
27 males gave up natural relations with females and were consumed with defiling lust for one another, males committing shameless acts with males and receiving in their own bodies the well-deserved AIDS-and-other-VD-plus-much-more penalty for their same-gender homosodomizing error.
My reaction to atheist and agnostic anti-Christian naysayers?
"Hey, you atheists and agnostics: Are you so STUPID or RETARDED that you do not discern nor perceive, by the Scripture verses quoted above, WHO the whole problem of sociological devastation is caused by? WHO is to BLAME? WHO is at FAULT?
The problem is NOT the Creator God. The problem is YOU, and other assholes LIKE you."
And, with a thumbed nose, then my hand waving to and fro down near my anus with my back toward them, following by my rigidly-uplifted third finger flashed at them, the ultimate explanation is fervently communicated to all atheists and agnostics:
First Corinthians 16:22 If any one has no love for the Lord, let him be accursed. Our Lord, come!
Should America be in the business of foreign-countries regime change?
The hierarchy of American government tried that by toppling Saddam Hussein of Iraq for the sake of protecting Israel and free flow of imported Middle-Eastern oil....but did not follow up with lasting military support for establishing Christian democracy in Iraq - and so ISIS moved in.
What advantage was there in the Obama/Rice/Hillary-led coalition ousting Gaddafi and letting ISIS-supportive revolutionaries destroy him....and Hillary with cohorts Obama and Rice dethroning Mubarak in Egypt - only to have the ISIS-sympathetic Muslim Brotherhood take over?
And now Assad of Syria, who even Netanyahu does not want to pick a fight with?
So what if Assad is allegedly a "puppet" of the religious Rouhani of Iran? Is America able to subjugate Rouhani of Iran into the summertime-immodest defilement of decandent-western democracy...while Obamanites fund Rouhani with tons of money for non-admitted nuclear-weapons and missile-transport development?
Sunnis versus Shias. Shias versus Sunnis.
Proverbs 26:17 He who meddles in a quarrel not his own is like one who takes a passing dog by the ears.